Review



enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa total tgfβ1 levels  (Boster Bio)


Bioz Verified Symbol Boster Bio is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Boster Bio manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Boster Bio enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa total tgfβ1 levels
    Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Elisa Total Tgfβ1 Levels, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 188 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa total tgfβ1 levels/product/Boster Bio
    Average 95 stars, based on 188 article reviews
    enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa total tgfβ1 levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    R&D Systems mouse tgf β1 levels
    Mouse Tgf β1 Levels, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse tgf β1 levels/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse tgf β1 levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Boster Bio enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa total tgfβ1 levels
    Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Elisa Total Tgfβ1 Levels, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa total tgfβ1 levels/product/Boster Bio
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa total tgfβ1 levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Boster Bio tgf β levels
    Tgf β Levels, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf β levels/product/Boster Bio
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf β levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Boster Bio tgf β1 levels
    Tgf β1 Levels, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf β1 levels/product/Boster Bio
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf β1 levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Boster Bio tgfβ1 protein levels
    Fig. 1 Optimization and validation of knockdown of porcine <t>TGFβ1</t> mRNA expression and protein translation by AS ODNs. A) MDMs under bright-field microscopy. B) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA under immunofluorescent microscopy. C) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA com plexed with different concentrations of transfection reagent and transfection period. D) Effect of TGFβ1 antisense (AS1-4), sense (S1-4) and scramble (Scr1-4) phosphorothioate-modified ODNs on the expression of TGFβ1 mRNA in MDMs stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 1) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. E) Optimization of TGFβAS1 concentration for TGFβ1 mRNA knockdown on MDMs trans fected with TGFβAS1 (0.5, 1, or 2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 2) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. F) TGFβ1 protein levels in MDMs transfected with TGFβAS1 (2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. In all figures, error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD). Mean differences of TGFβ1 gene expression or protein translation among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Mean differences of percentages of fluoresced cells among groups at time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Different letters indicate significant differences. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level
    Tgfβ1 Protein Levels, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgfβ1 protein levels/product/Boster Bio
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgfβ1 protein levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Boster Bio tgf β1 ek0515 cytokine levels
    Fig. 1 Optimization and validation of knockdown of porcine <t>TGFβ1</t> mRNA expression and protein translation by AS ODNs. A) MDMs under bright-field microscopy. B) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA under immunofluorescent microscopy. C) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA com plexed with different concentrations of transfection reagent and transfection period. D) Effect of TGFβ1 antisense (AS1-4), sense (S1-4) and scramble (Scr1-4) phosphorothioate-modified ODNs on the expression of TGFβ1 mRNA in MDMs stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 1) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. E) Optimization of TGFβAS1 concentration for TGFβ1 mRNA knockdown on MDMs trans fected with TGFβAS1 (0.5, 1, or 2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 2) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. F) TGFβ1 protein levels in MDMs transfected with TGFβAS1 (2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. In all figures, error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD). Mean differences of TGFβ1 gene expression or protein translation among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Mean differences of percentages of fluoresced cells among groups at time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Different letters indicate significant differences. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level
    Tgf β1 Ek0515 Cytokine Levels, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf β1 ek0515 cytokine levels/product/Boster Bio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf β1 ek0515 cytokine levels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Boster Bio tgf β level
    TGF‐β1 <t>and</t> <t>CD105</t> demonstrated as CAD biomarkers. (a, b) Bar graphs representing serum levels of TGF‐β1 and CD105 with different CAD severity. (c, d) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) for TGF‐β1 and CD105 (AUC = 0.701 and 0.731 respectively). Diagonal line indicates zero predictive value for the model. Data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation moment correlation coefficient.
    Tgf β Level, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf β level/product/Boster Bio
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf β level - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fig. 1 Optimization and validation of knockdown of porcine TGFβ1 mRNA expression and protein translation by AS ODNs. A) MDMs under bright-field microscopy. B) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA under immunofluorescent microscopy. C) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA com plexed with different concentrations of transfection reagent and transfection period. D) Effect of TGFβ1 antisense (AS1-4), sense (S1-4) and scramble (Scr1-4) phosphorothioate-modified ODNs on the expression of TGFβ1 mRNA in MDMs stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 1) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. E) Optimization of TGFβAS1 concentration for TGFβ1 mRNA knockdown on MDMs trans fected with TGFβAS1 (0.5, 1, or 2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 2) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. F) TGFβ1 protein levels in MDMs transfected with TGFβAS1 (2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. In all figures, error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD). Mean differences of TGFβ1 gene expression or protein translation among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Mean differences of percentages of fluoresced cells among groups at time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Different letters indicate significant differences. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level

    Journal: BMC veterinary research

    Article Title: Knock down of transforming growth factor beta improves expressions of co-stimulatory molecules, type I interferon-regulated genes, and pro-inflammatory cytokine in PRRSV-inoculated monocyte-derived macrophages.

    doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03760-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1 Optimization and validation of knockdown of porcine TGFβ1 mRNA expression and protein translation by AS ODNs. A) MDMs under bright-field microscopy. B) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA under immunofluorescent microscopy. C) MDMs uptake of fluorescent-labeled siRNA com plexed with different concentrations of transfection reagent and transfection period. D) Effect of TGFβ1 antisense (AS1-4), sense (S1-4) and scramble (Scr1-4) phosphorothioate-modified ODNs on the expression of TGFβ1 mRNA in MDMs stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 1) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. E) Optimization of TGFβAS1 concentration for TGFβ1 mRNA knockdown on MDMs trans fected with TGFβAS1 (0.5, 1, or 2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. Band intensities (Additional file 2) indicate the quality of TGFβ1 knockdown. F) TGFβ1 protein levels in MDMs transfected with TGFβAS1 (2 µM) and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. In all figures, error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD). Mean differences of TGFβ1 gene expression or protein translation among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Mean differences of percentages of fluoresced cells among groups at time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Different letters indicate significant differences. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level

    Article Snippet: Cell culture supernatants were collected for subsequent determination of TGFβ1 protein levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Porcine TGF Beta 1 PicoKineTM ELISA kit, Boster Biological Technology, Pleasanton, CA).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Knockdown, Expressing, Microscopy, Labeling, Transfection, Modification, Concentration Assay, Standard Deviation, Gene Expression

    Fig. 4 Effect of TGFβAS1 on TGFβ1 protein translation in PRRSV-2-inoculated MDMs. MDMs were transfected with TGFβAS1, then inoculated with either cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. MDMs inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2 and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated control. MDMs treated with transfection media (Tr. media) and inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, then stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated/Tr. media control. MDMs inoculated with mock Ag and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as mock control. Untreated MDMs receiving culture media in the presence or absence of a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Cell culture supernatants were collected for ELISA. Error bars indicate the SD. Mean differences of TGFβ1 protein translation among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Different letters indicate significant differences. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level

    Journal: BMC veterinary research

    Article Title: Knock down of transforming growth factor beta improves expressions of co-stimulatory molecules, type I interferon-regulated genes, and pro-inflammatory cytokine in PRRSV-inoculated monocyte-derived macrophages.

    doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03760-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4 Effect of TGFβAS1 on TGFβ1 protein translation in PRRSV-2-inoculated MDMs. MDMs were transfected with TGFβAS1, then inoculated with either cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS. MDMs inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2 and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated control. MDMs treated with transfection media (Tr. media) and inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, then stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated/Tr. media control. MDMs inoculated with mock Ag and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as mock control. Untreated MDMs receiving culture media in the presence or absence of a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Cell culture supernatants were collected for ELISA. Error bars indicate the SD. Mean differences of TGFβ1 protein translation among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test. Different letters indicate significant differences. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level

    Article Snippet: Cell culture supernatants were collected for subsequent determination of TGFβ1 protein levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Porcine TGF Beta 1 PicoKineTM ELISA kit, Boster Biological Technology, Pleasanton, CA).

    Techniques: Transfection, Control, Cell Culture, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Fig. 5 Effect of TGFβ knockdown on PRRSV copy numbers in PRRSV-2-inoculated MDMs. MDMs were transfected with TGFβAS1, then inoculated with either cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2 (0 h), and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS (48 h). MDMs inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2 and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated control. MDMs transfected with Scr1, then inoculated with either cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated/Scr1 control. MDMs treated with transfection media (Tr. media), then inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated/Tr. media control. MDMs receiving mock Ag plus a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as uninoculated control. Cell culture supernatants were collected for real-time PCR. The CT values were obtained and PRRSV-2 ORF7 RNA copy numbers were calculated based on the CT standard curve generated from 101-108 copies of recombinant PRRSV-2 ORF7 plasmids. Data were presented in log 10 scale of copy number/ml. Error bars indicate the SD. Mean differences of PRRSV-2 ORF7 RNA copy numbers among groups at time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD. Different superscript letters indicate significant difference. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level

    Journal: BMC veterinary research

    Article Title: Knock down of transforming growth factor beta improves expressions of co-stimulatory molecules, type I interferon-regulated genes, and pro-inflammatory cytokine in PRRSV-inoculated monocyte-derived macrophages.

    doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03760-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 5 Effect of TGFβ knockdown on PRRSV copy numbers in PRRSV-2-inoculated MDMs. MDMs were transfected with TGFβAS1, then inoculated with either cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2 (0 h), and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS (48 h). MDMs inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2 and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated control. MDMs transfected with Scr1, then inoculated with either cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated/Scr1 control. MDMs treated with transfection media (Tr. media), then inoculated with cPRRSV-2 or HP-PRRSV-2, and stimulated with a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as PRRSV-2-inoculated/Tr. media control. MDMs receiving mock Ag plus a mixture of poly I:C and LPS served as uninoculated control. Cell culture supernatants were collected for real-time PCR. The CT values were obtained and PRRSV-2 ORF7 RNA copy numbers were calculated based on the CT standard curve generated from 101-108 copies of recombinant PRRSV-2 ORF7 plasmids. Data were presented in log 10 scale of copy number/ml. Error bars indicate the SD. Mean differences of PRRSV-2 ORF7 RNA copy numbers among groups at time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD. Different superscript letters indicate significant difference. P < 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level

    Article Snippet: Cell culture supernatants were collected for subsequent determination of TGFβ1 protein levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Porcine TGF Beta 1 PicoKineTM ELISA kit, Boster Biological Technology, Pleasanton, CA).

    Techniques: Knockdown, Transfection, Control, Cell Culture, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Generated, Recombinant

    TGF‐β1 and CD105 demonstrated as CAD biomarkers. (a, b) Bar graphs representing serum levels of TGF‐β1 and CD105 with different CAD severity. (c, d) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) for TGF‐β1 and CD105 (AUC = 0.701 and 0.731 respectively). Diagonal line indicates zero predictive value for the model. Data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation moment correlation coefficient.

    Journal: Physiological Reports

    Article Title: Dapagliflozin prevents ERK activation and SGLT2‐dependent endoglin upregulation in a mechanically provoked cardiac injury model

    doi: 10.14814/phy2.15990

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TGF‐β1 and CD105 demonstrated as CAD biomarkers. (a, b) Bar graphs representing serum levels of TGF‐β1 and CD105 with different CAD severity. (c, d) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) for TGF‐β1 and CD105 (AUC = 0.701 and 0.731 respectively). Diagonal line indicates zero predictive value for the model. Data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation moment correlation coefficient.

    Article Snippet: To analyze CD105 and TGF‐β level, the human CD105 ELISA kit (Boster Biological Technology, CatEK0644) and human TGF‐β assay ELISA kit (Boster Biological Technology, CatEK0513) were used to detect CD105 and TGF‐β level, respectively, in the collected serum.

    Techniques: MANN-WHITNEY